Browse by State
Select a state to see local filing fees, requirements, and timelines for all 12 common legal processes.
Educational purposes only. Fees and requirements vary by county within each state. Always verify with your local court before filing.
How Civil Cases Resolve Across the 10-State Index
Across the 10 states tracked here, the dominant outcome for civil filings is settlement — roughly 42% of dispositions resolve through negotiated agreement before trial. Plaintiff and defendant judgments together account for ~30%, while default judgments (typically unanswered debt or eviction filings) and dismissals (lack of standing, jurisdiction, or merit) round out the remainder. State-by-state, the composition shifts based on local court rules, mandatory mediation programs, and case-mix.
Visualization renders the PlainCivil signature courthouse-colonnade chart — each fluted column is a disposition class, scaled to its national share.
California
12 processes
California Courts
Florida
12 processes
Florida Courts
Georgia
12 processes
Georgia Courts
Illinois
12 processes
Illinois Courts
Michigan
12 processes
Michigan Courts
New York
12 processes
New York Courts
North Carolina
12 processes
North Carolina Courts
Ohio
12 processes
Ohio Courts
Pennsylvania
12 processes
Pennsylvania Courts
Texas
12 processes
Texas Courts
Navigating PlainCivil by State
The state index is the best place to start if your question is geographic ("Which state leads in X?", "What does this look like in my state?"). Each state page drills down into the full set of records for that jurisdiction, along with summary statistics and comparisons across the country. Data coverage can vary by state — some states publish richer underlying datasets, some refresh more often, and a small number of states lag the national median. We flag coverage gaps on the state page itself.
State-Level Data Quality
Because each state operates its own reporting pipeline, subtle format differences show up across the dataset. We normalize obvious discrepancies — title casing, leading zeros on zip codes, abbreviation expansions — without altering the underlying data. When two states use incompatible category codes for the same real-world concept, we map them to a common taxonomy and document the mapping on the methodology page. Where a mapping is imperfect, we leave the original category visible on the record.
Interpreting State Comparisons
Raw totals by state can be misleading if you do not account for population. Whenever we present a count-based ranking, we also publish a per-capita variant when meaningful. Per-capita comparisons should be read with care in small states and sparsely populated states: the denominator is small, so one or two records can swing the rate substantially. For consequential comparisons, always click through to the state page and look at the underlying count, the time frame, and the methodology note before concluding that a difference is real.
When State Data Disagrees With Federal Data
Occasionally the state-level number you see on PlainCivil will differ from a federal aggregate. This is usually because the state reported its data on a different cadence, used a slightly different population, or applied a narrower definition of the measured concept. We cite the exact state dataset on the state page; if you need to reconcile with a federal source, the methodology page links both and explains the differences. We do not silently "correct" state data to match federal data or vice versa.
| Publisher | Kiznis Studio |
| Sources | Public state court datasets and federal civil-justice records |